Latest Analysis

WPS Dispersal: Winners, Losers

Shannon Boxx, selected first in Thursday's WPS Dispersal Draft, is one of the newest members of St. Louis Athletica.  (Photo: Newscom)

Shannon Boxx, selected first in Thursday's WPS Dispersal Draft, is one of the newest members of St. Louis Athletica. (Photo: Newscom)

When former Sol midfielder Aya Miyama fell to St. Louis with the eighth pick of Thursday’s dispersal, we received the first hint that the teams with international roster slots could make-out in Thursday’s Women’s Professional Soccer dispersal draft.

The draft was held to allocate the former Los Angeles Sol players to the eight remaining WPS teams, and when St. Louis acquired the draft’s first pick earlier this week, speculation as to who would be their choice ranged from Marta to Shannon Boxx to Aya Miyama.

We knew on Tuesday night that Marta was not going to St. Louis. That Athletica were able to get the other two makes them the day’s big winner.

They were able to collect Miyama and (at the end of the draft) Catherine Sorensen because few teams had international roster spots available. Athletica did, and they used them wisely, taking Boxx first knowing that – with internationals Karina LeBlanc (Philadelphia) and Marta going early – other internationals could fall.

Miyama, a player who led last year’s Sol in appearances and minutes player, did fall, all the way to the end of the first round. There was a danger of Washington, who took Nigerian Faith Ikidi in the second round, snatching the Japan international; however, when Washington had Brittany Bock fall into their laps at seven, they took the United States’ defender.

You could argue that Miyama would have gone higher had the dispersal draft been held earlier in the offseason – before international signings had taken many team’s foreign player slots. Miyama’s salary concerns may have also been more palatable before teams started allocated next season’s budget to new players.

St. Louis’s ability to take on Miyama in addition to Boxx, Sorenson, and trading up to get Tina DiMartino saw Athletic make the biggest improvements through the dispersal.

For getting Marta, FC Gold Pride could also be seen as a dispersal draft winner, though her salary makes that a more debatable contention.

Washington had a good defender fall to them at seven, and Boston could say the same with Stephanie Cox at five. Each club got strong value with their picks.

Sky Blue took two recent draftees – Nikki Washington at six, Kiersten Dallstream at 11 – a possible indication that they did not want to take on a more established veteran’s wages. It could also indicates they think highly of Washington and Dallstream.

Atlanta’s first pick was at number nine, where the Beat got good value with Manya Makoski. They surprisingly took an international with their final pick, selecting Pavlina Scasna at sixteen.

Casey Nogueira's rights were selected by Chicago Red Stars on Thursday, who traded away or passed on their remaining picks.  (Photo: Newscom)

Casey Nogueira's rights were selected by Chicago Red Stars on Thursday, who traded away or passed on their remaining picks. (Photo: Newscom)

If there was a loser in today’s draft, it was only a relative one.

Chicago took Casey Nogueira – ahead of players like Cox and Bock – and then opted out of the draft, picking up two 2011 second round draft picks in trading down from thirteen to fourteen (with FC Gold Pride, who took Kiki Bosio) and then trading the fourteenth pick to St. Louis (the DiMartino trade).

Red Stars ended up with only Nogueira while each other team picked up multiple players, many of whom are more accomplished than the former Tar Heel, who has great potential.

Chicago opting out of their remaining picks hints at an unwillingness to take on players and their salary commitments.

That may be a viable long term strategy, but relative to the other teams in the league, Chicago lost ground in 2010.

  • Share/Bookmark

4 comments to WPS Dispersal: Winners, Losers

  • So the Red Stars passed on Cox and Bock? Large deal! They already have six defenders on board (including three new additions for this season) but only three forwards. Noogie was the right pick for them… for now and for the future. And they still have another international coming down the pipeline so don’t worry about their willingness to take on more accomplished players. They will accomplish plenty with the players they already have.

  • Richard Farley

    Great points, re: number of defenders, though it still bares mentioning whether they would have been better with Cox or Bock in place of some of the ones they had or if they should have traded that pick. I’m not sure “Large deal” is quite the right way to … rebut.

  • Vvc13685

    At first glance, the price of a 2011 second round draft pick is steep for the trade from the FC Gold Pride to move up 1 spot to pick Kiki Bosio. This trade was immediately followed by another trade by St Louis Athletic to get Tina DiMartino. Do you have any insight why FC Gold Pride was willing to pay such a steep price for the trade? Was FC Gold Pride somehow aware that St Louis or another club was trying to move up and possibly take Kiki Bosio? I don’t know much about Kiki Bosio. She must be really good in order for FC Gold Pride to make the move.

  • Richard Farley

    The only thing I can provide: Gold Pride really liked Bosio. Usually when trades like that happen (moving up one spot), it’s because the team trading into the spot wants to keep somebody else from trading in. Maybe they hear St. Louis talking to Chicago and get scared that Bosio was going to go. However, we know St. Louis went in a totally different direction, taking a contracted player

    Gold Pride must have just wanted 100% certainty on Bosio. The price of a second round pick and their dispersal draft pick? They seem to like Kiki a lot.

    The other thing, and we talk about this on the pod I’m about to release: Gold Pride’s attack is now stacked. How much will Bosio play, and how soon?

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>